摘要內容
| 年度卷號期數 | 2019年 38卷 3期 |
| 中文主題 | 應用不同方法計算離岸風機單樁基礎所受波浪力之適用性探討 |
| 英文主題 | Applicability of Different Methods for Computing Wave Forces on Monopile Foundation of Offshore Wind Turbine |
| 中文作者 | 曾郁安、陳冠臻、林宗岳、邱方伶、辛敬業 |
| 英文作者 | Y.A. Tzeng K.C. Chen T.Y. Lin F.L. Chiu C.Y. Hsin | 中文關鍵字 | 離岸風機基礎，波浪負荷，Morison 方程式，WAMIT，RANS |
| 英文關鍵字 | Offshore Wind Turbine Foundation, Wave Load, Morison Equation, WAMIT, RANS | 中文摘要 | 離岸風機的基礎結構物，不論是單樁、三腳管式、套管式或是重力式等，其受力必須考慮到水深、海浪、洋流以及海床地質的影響。本文應用不同的計算方法計算離岸風機單樁基礎結構豎立於海中承受的波浪負荷，波浪條件計算了三種週期及五種波高，從較小的波高逐漸增加到產生碎波的波高，組合而成十五種不同的波浪條件，並定義了單位波高的受力作為比較基準。水動力學分析方法上，我們應用三種方法進行計算，一是求解莫理森方程式 (Morison equation)，二是使用勢流計算軟體WAMIT，三是應用黏性流的RANS 方法。莫理森方程式與WAMIT 僅能用於線性分析，無法呈現非線性波浪條件下的分析。黏性流RANS 方法應用商用軟體STAR-CCM+進行計算，由於接近真實的物理現象，因此可以完整模擬線性與非線性的受力，但需要耗費大量的計算時間和成本。本文利用三種方法和十五種不同的波浪情況進行離岸風機單樁基礎計算，除了三種方法計算結果的比較之外，並與文獻MacCamy & Fuchs 方法的結果進行驗證，結果顯示在非碎波情況時，三種方法計算的波高和受力關係大致呈線性成長，而單位波高的受力會隨著週期增加而減少，和文獻的趨勢一致；但在碎波情況時，RANS 方法計算所得之受力會急遽增加，而單位波高的受力由於無法確定碎波點的位置，趨勢沒有辦法準確觀察。在比較結果後，本文中所應用的三種方法各有其優點與缺點，因此需要針對不同海況選擇最適當的方法。 |
| 英文摘要 | The wave load of an offshore wind turbine foundation is determined by water depth, waves, ocean currents and seabed geology, whether it is a monopile, tripod, jacket, or gravity type foundation. In this paper, different computational methods are used to compute the wave load of the offshore wind turbine monopile foundation. Fifteen wave conditions are set by three periods and five wave heights which gradually increase from small waves to breaking waves, and the force per wave amplitude is defined as a comparison parameter. For the hydrodynamic analysis of the foundation, we use three methods to compute, they are self-developed Morison equation program, potential flow program WAMIT, and the viscous flow RANS software Star-CCM+. Since the physics of viscous flow method is closer to the real physical phenomenon, it is possible to completely simulate linear and nonlinear forces with the method, but it takes a lot of computational time and cost to conduct. In addition to the comparison of the computational results of three methods, the results are also compared with the analytical solutions by Mac-Camy and Fuchs. The results show that in the case of non-breaking wave, the wave height and force relationship computed by the three methods generally grow linearly, while the force per wave amplitude decreases with the increase of the period, which is consistent with the analytical solutions. However, in the case of breaking waves, the force computed by the RANS method increases sharply, and the force per wave amplitude cannot be accurately observed due to the indeterminate nature of the posi-tion of the breaking point. After comparing the results, it is recommended one of the three methods applied for various sea conditions. |
電子全文：本篇電子全文僅提供本學會會員閱覽，會員請註冊或登入，非會員請參考入會辦法。